Integrity. Experience. Success.
We are a litigation and insurance coverage boutique committed to providing our clients with high-value legal services in an efficient and flexible manner. We make the effort to understand and to find the right solution to achieve our clients’ goals while upholding our firm’s core values of service, integrity, collaboration, passion, and diversity.
After spending decades in some of the world’s largest law firms, our founding partners decided to create a firm that would provide exceptional service to its clients from a more accessible platform. We pride ourselves in understanding our clients’ business objectives and collaborating with them on creative solutions to achieve those goals. All our attorneys are active members of the Texas legal community and are continually recognized for their successes.
Our Team
Business is challenging. Sometimes, those challenges can morph into a dispute, including disputes with former partners, clients, customers, as well as regulators and other government entities. Our clients rely on us to help them navigate these challenges. We evaluate each new challenge at the outset and determine the best strategy to help our clients achieve their objectives. Whether that strategy calls for early negotiations or aggressive litigation, our attorneys have the experience and skill to protect our clients’ interests and achieve their goals.
Read more
Financial institutions face unique legal challenges. Not only are there numerous state and federal regulations that financial institutions must abide by, but financial institutions can also face a variety of civil claims. Working with an experienced team of attorneys is crucial for these types of companies. Our attorneys are experienced in representing financial institutions in the courtroom, before regulators, and in internal investigations.
Read more
Our attorneys have extensive experience representing and advising employers on a myriad of issues. Our firm represents employers and employees in employment disputes and works with employers to minimize the potential for future disputes. Our attorneys also help employers protect trade secrets and ensure security of competitively-valuable electronic data.
Read more
Our attorneys have experience representing domestic and foreign insurers in litigation involving claims for declaratory judgment, breach of contract, bad faith, and alleged prompt-pay violations. Our attorneys have represented insurers with a wide-range of exposures, from a million dollars to several billion dollars, arising out of directors and officers, management liability, pollution legal liability, professional indemnity, errors and omissions, CGL, property insurance, title insurance, and excess insurance policies. In each matter, we work relentlessly to position our clients and prepare their case for a judge or jury.
Read More
Our insurance clients often face complicated coverage issues and turn to us to help them navigate their challenges. We have extensive experience advising insurers on their risks, responsibilities, and rights arising out of wide-range of insurance policies including, directors and officers, management liability, private equity liability, pollution legal liability, professional indemnity, errors and omissions, CGL, property insurance, title insurance, and excess insurance.
Read more
Coverage disputes can be costly and time consuming for an insurance company. They can also lead to a policy being broadly construed against an insurance company resulting in an insurer having to cover unintended risks. The best way to avoid these unnecessary expenses and burdens is to have clear policy language from the outset. Therefore, we frequently work with our clients to provide advice and consultation as they draft and develop their policy forms and endorsements.
read more
We represent the interests of both reinsurers and cedents. We understand reinsurance disputes and the business objectives driving them and are always looking for creative and effective solutions. When the parties cannot arrive at a resolution, our attorneys have the experience to litigate your reinsurance dispute.
read more
When an attorney or firm is named in a lawsuit, emotions run high. Attorneys take pride in their work, and allegations of malpractice sting. Our attorneys have successfully defended legal malpractice lawsuits across the country. These claims have ranged from a lawyer’s alleged failure to execute his client’s instructions, to alleged fraud in the application of client funds, to allegedly incorrect tax advice provided to hedge fund owners. From initial assessment to jury verdict, we have experience representing and guiding clients through malpractice allegations.
read more
Law firms face unique problems, including issues with departing and underperforming partners, compliance with regulations and client standards, cybersecurity, and complicated ethics and conflicts issues. The lawyers in our firm have advised clients on the range of issues facing firms. Barry Chasnoff was previously General Counsel to the international law firm Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld and served on that firm’s management committee for 15 years. This unique experience and expertise allows our firm to provide our law firm clients with rapid and tested advice when confronting pressing issues.
read more 
Chasnoff, Mungia, Pepping & Stribling, LLP proudly announces the addition of Lauren A. Valkenaar as a named partner in the Firm. The Firm will rename itself as Chasnoff, Mungia, Valkenaar, Pepping & Stribling, LLP (Chasnoff | Stribling).
In BioChemics, Inc. v. AXIS Reinsurance Co., 2019 WL 2223125 (1st Cir. May 23, 2019), the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit held that a D&O policy did not provide coverage for an SEC action related to an investigation that began prior to the policy incepting.
In Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. v. Allied World Nat’l Assurance Co., 2019 WL 2357044 (D. Minn. June 4, 2019), the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota held that a prior acts exclusion in an excess D&O policy precluded coverage for claim that occurred during the policy period because the claim arose from “the same nucleus of operative facts” as a claim that occurred prior to the policy incepting.
In Fort Bend County, Texas v. Davis, 2019 WL 2331306 (U.S. June 3, 2019), the Supreme Court of the United States held that failing to file a charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission does not deprive a court of jurisdiction over an employment discrimination lawsuit.
